Dummy Dashboard — Sample Survey Analytics

Section 01

Programme at a Glance

Headline collection status for the demonstration data set: completed interviews against the —-unit sampling frame, how the three randomised study arms are filling up, and the outcome of every fieldwork attempt. All entity names below (circles, localities, staff) are generated placeholders — only the counts are carried through from a real collection shape.

Daily Completed Interviews

Completed interviews per field day, with a 3-day rolling average

Overall Progress vs Target

Completed interviews against the —-unit sampling target

Completed by Study Arm

Control · Treatment 1 · Treatment 2

Attempt Disposition

Outcome of every fieldwork attempt recorded so far

Completed Interviews by Circle

Each bar shows completed (solid) against the remaining circle target (shaded). Labelled as completed / target with the completion rate.

Sampling frame: — units, allocated Treatment 1 = —, Treatment 2 = —, Control = —. Collected on a digital CAPI stack with GPS capture at the unit. Synthetic demonstration data — not a live study. Dashboard by Research Solutions (M&A Research Solutions LLC) | www.rs.org.pk

Section 02

Field Operations & Data Quality

Operational view of the collection: how the completed sample has accumulated against a linear target pace, how output is distributed across the field team, and how long interviews are running — the three signals that usually surface a data-quality problem first.

Cumulative Completion vs Sampling Target

Running total of completed interviews against the full frame target — the gap is the work still outstanding

Output by Enumerator

Completed interviews per field staff member (identifiers anonymised)

Interview Duration Distribution

Completed interviews by elapsed instrument time — a tight distribution is the expected shape

Enumerator identifiers are sequential placeholders ranked by output. Duration is measured from consent to instrument submission and excludes suspended cases. The projected finish date extrapolates the average daily completion rate observed so far.

Section 03 · Indicator set A1–A6

Module A

Awareness, adoption and self-rated capability block. Two binary screeners (A1, A2), one ordinal capability scale (A6), and three multiple-response batteries covering known services (A3), barriers to use (A4) and assisted-use sources (A5).

A1 · Awareness screener

Binary indicator · base = all consenting respondents

A2 · Adoption screener

Binary indicator · recall window 12 months

A6 · Self-rated capability

4-point ordinal scale, share of valid responses

A3 · Services recognised

Multiple response — respondents selecting each item

A4 · Barriers to use

Multiple response — respondents citing each barrier

A5 · Assisted-use source

Who the respondent would rely on, share of valid responses

Asked of all consenting respondents. Multiple-response items report counts, single-response items report shares of the valid base. Codes 97 = Don't know, 98 = Refused are shown separately and excluded from "top-box" summaries.

Section 04 · Indicator set B1–B11

Module B

Interaction and institutional-perception block. Covers recent contact and its channel (B1–B3), three ordinal perception scales (B4–B6), and a sensitive sub-module fielded through indirect vignettes rather than direct questioning (B7–B11).

B1 · Any contact in period

Binary indicator · recall window 12 months

B2 · Channel of contact

Most recent interaction, categorical

B3 · Initiating party

Which side opened the interaction

B4 · Trust scale

4-point ordinal, share of valid responses

B5 · Satisfaction scale

4-point ordinal, share of valid responses

B6 · Treatment-quality scale

4-point ordinal, asked of those with contact

B7 · Perceived prevalence

5-point frequency scale, share of valid responses

B8 · Vignette — Profile A vs Profile B

Which of two matched profiles respondents expect to be targeted

B9 · Attributed driver of variation

Factor A (technical) vs Factor B (relational), share of valid responses

B10 · Perceived selection criteria

Multiple response — respondents citing each criterion

The sensitive sub-module uses indirect vignettes plus one direct experience item (B11), reported in the KPI strip only. Ordinal scales are shown as shares of the valid base; "top-2 box" refers to the two most positive categories.

Section 05 · Indicator set C1–C11

Module C

Records, documentation and prior-belief block. Captures whether respondents have ever inspected their own record (C1), how they believe it was produced (C2), how the recorded figures compare with their own understanding (C3–C4), documentation held (C7–C8) and stated intent to contest (C9–C11). All prior beliefs are elicited before any information is delivered.

C1 · Record ever inspected

Categorical, includes recency split

C3 · Recorded measure I vs belief

Direction of the perceived gap, share of valid responses

C4 · Recorded measure II vs belief

Direction of the perceived gap, share of valid responses

C2 · Believed production method

Multiple response — how respondents think the record was produced

C6 · Awareness of redress channels

Multiple response — channels respondents can name unprompted

C7 · Registration status

How the unit is held in official records, share of valid responses

C8 · Documents held

Share of respondents in possession of each document

C5 · Formal notice received

Binary indicator · recall window 12 months

C8b · Ease of producing documents

5-point ordinal, share of valid responses

C9 · Stated intent to contest (0–10)

Self-reported likelihood of acting within three months

C10 · Reason for not contesting

Single response among those not intending to act

C11 · Perceived motive for review

Multiple response — why respondents believe reviews are initiated

Prior beliefs are asked before any information treatment is delivered. Document possession excludes "Don't know" and "Refused" from the base. Numeric 0–10 items are shown as raw response counts, not shares.

Section 06 · Randomised information experiment

Module D

The experimental core. Control receives no script; Treatment 1 receives a generic information script; Treatment 2 additionally receives a unit-specific figure. Comprehension checks verify that the script landed, and the attitude battery is compared across arms for a first read on treatment effects.

Attitude indicators by study arm

Share giving the favourable answer, split by randomised arm — the first field read on treatment effects

D0 · Comprehension checks passed

Share answering each recall check correctly (treated arms only)

D4 · Expected accuracy (0–10)

Respondent's expectation of how many of ten cases the method would get right

D1 · Reliability agreement

4-point agreement scale, share of valid responses

D2 · Uniform-treatment agreement

4-point agreement scale, share of valid responses

D3 · Perceived correctability

4-point ordinal, share of valid responses

D5 · Expected direction of error

Whether the method is expected to over- or under-state

D6 · Method A vs Method B

Which approach respondents expect to err more often

D7 · Post-treatment belief gap

Re-asked after the script — direction versus the existing record

D8 · Stated concerns

Multiple response (up to two) — main reservations raised

D9 · Effect of supporting evidence

Change in stated confidence when shown the underlying evidence

Comprehension checks are administered immediately after the script and apply to treated arms only. Agreement items use 4-point scales; the arm comparison uses top-2-box shares and should be interpreted with caution at small cell sizes.

Section 07 · Randomised price experiment

Module E

Revealed willingness to pay. Each respondent is offered the same product at one of three randomly assigned prices, tracing an incentive-compatible demand curve, after completing an eleven-round adaptive choice experiment over hypothetical alternatives.

E1 · Demand curve — uptake by randomised price

Share accepting the offer at each randomly assigned price point

E1a · Overall uptake

Pooled across all three price points

E2 · Prefilled value band

Sampled units by recorded annual value band

E3 · Scenario believability (0–10)

How realistic respondents found the hypothetical alternatives

Prices are randomised at the unit level in the sampling frame, so uptake differences across price points identify the demand curve without further adjustment. The adaptive choice experiment runs eleven rounds per respondent.

Section 08 · Observation & profiling

Module F

Enumerator-observed characteristics of the sampled unit and the interview itself. These items are recorded by the field staff member rather than reported by the respondent, and are used both as covariates and as a quality-assurance signal on interview conditions.

F1 · Structure tiers

Observed number of tiers per sampled unit

F2 · Size band distribution

Sampled units by recorded size band

F3 · Built-area band

Sampled units by recorded built-area band

F4 · Observed assets present

Multiple response — assets visible at the unit

F5 · Observer ratings (1–5)

Mean enumerator rating on four blinded observation dimensions

F6 · Presentation flag

Binary observation recorded at the doorstep

F7 · Interview-comfort flag

Whether the respondent appeared uneasy during the interview

F8 · Response-candour flag

Enumerator's judgement that answers were given openly

F9 · Interview-condition log

Recorded conditions where the enumerator flagged anything other than a routine interview

Observation items are completed by the enumerator after the interview and are never read out to the respondent. Ratings are recorded on a blinded 1–5 scale; the log records only non-routine conditions, so its base is smaller than the completed-interview count.

Section 09 · Operational tracker

Locality Completion Tracker

Completion status for every locality in the sampling frame — completed interviews against sampled units, grouped by circle and split by size band. Search by locality or circle, filter by status or band, click any column to sort, or export the current view to CSV.

📐 Progress by Unit Size Band

Every unit in the frame is binned by its recorded size. Target = sampled units in that band; completed = interviews done in that band. This is the quickest check on whether smaller and larger units are being covered evenly.

Locality	Size Band	Circle	Completed	Sampled Target	Completion ▼	Status

Each row is one locality × size band. Targets = sampled units in that band; completion % = completed ÷ target. Rows are grouped by locality (bands smallest-first) by default — click any column to re-sort, or use the Size Band filter to isolate one band. Only started localities are shown by default; switch the status filter to "All localities" to include every locality in the frame.